While his membership battles each other on Twitter, CFLPA executive director Brian Ramsay says he didn’t feel the need to address the membership after news of a potential ratio change hit the headlines.
“Not at all. A healthy debate is a good thing. What this has shown us is – and we’ve talked about it for a long time – we’ve got a very engaged and passionate membership. Their engagement is refreshing on that specific issue and many others that haven’t hit the forefront, that we have that healthy debate on,” Ramsay said in a conference call Wednesday.
“That debate shows us how engaged our membership is. We’ve got reps like our membership that all have their own views on specific issues. What we are confident on as a group is that everyone is fully supportive of the package that we’ve put in front of the employer and the league.”
3DownNation’s Justin Dunk has reported that both the CFL and CFLPA are in favour of reducing the number of national starters from seven to five. Currently, seven of the 24 starters on offence and defence must be nationals, part of the 21 non-imports on the 44-man game day roster. But those numbers might change at the bargaining table.
Ramsay refused to clarify the CFLPA’s position on the ratio on Wednesday.
“What we have said from the start is that we won’t be getting into any of specifics of the conversations at the table,” Ramsay said. “We’ve been very clear that we won’t be bargaining in the media.”
Unfortunately for CFLPA, it’s membership is more than willing to debate the issue – mostly with each other. Fortunately for the union, it looks like things are finally starting to die down after Andrew Harris and others battled it out this weekend.
I can see how a top Canadian player would be offended by ratio changing talks. It's what increases their value. Doesn't make them right, but I get it. Things is, there's not enough top Canadian talent to produce as good a product as we have with American players included.
— SirVincent Rogers Sr. (@SirV55) March 20, 2019
If there was, we wouldn't need a ratio rule altogether. The ratio rule assures a place for the Canadian player in the CFL. The challenge now is making it as fair as possible across the board. Or simply owning the fact top Canadians have the most value in the CFL.
— SirVincent Rogers Sr. (@SirV55) March 20, 2019
Top American RBs are not on the same pay scale as Harris. None of them! How much better is he than them? That's debatable 🤷🏿♂️… but it paints 1 narrative on our ratio rule.
— SirVincent Rogers Sr. (@SirV55) March 20, 2019
Same goes for OLs. Excluding all the vet American OLs that have paid dues 2+ contracts, we may play alongside other players that make significantly more than us based on Nationality. While there are also limited job opportunities for us. All a result of the ratio.
— SirVincent Rogers Sr. (@SirV55) March 20, 2019
I have the ability to reason, but I'm not the brightest crayon in the box lol. We need to be able to trust those in positions of power to bargain on our behalf collectively. This isn't just about Canadians and Americans… unless it really is. 🤔
— SirVincent Rogers Sr. (@SirV55) March 20, 2019
Yeah, nevermind.